University of Sheffield, 30 March-1 April 2026

Intercultural Competence to Support Information Literacy Instruction and Workplace Interactions: Results from a Pilot Program

Presenter: Heather Howard
Start time: 15:30
End time: 16:30
Room: Seminar room 5
Chair: Kate Grigsby

Abstract

Libraries employees interact with people from different cultures in numerous ways, including in our interactions with students in information literacy instruction sessions and reference consultations, as well as in our exchanges with colleagues, vendors, and other library patrons, underscoring the importance of librarian intercultural competence (Zanescu, 2018). The term culture refers to “the customs, arts, social institutions, and achievements of a particular nation, people, or other social group,” (Oxford University Press, 2010). Culture can be manifested internationally and domestically and can also apply to social groups, business organizations, and the departments, age groups, and teams within them. Intercultural Competence is defined as “how individuals fare in intercultural settings,” (Lou & Chan, 2022). Information literacy and intercultural competence are particularly connected, as in order to be truly information literate, one must understand the cultural context in which information is created, accessed, and evaluated as well as the cultural background of the information user (Bochenek et al., 2025; Hicks & Lloyd, 2016; Morrison, 2009).



At our academic institution we piloted the use of the two intercultural competence frameworks, the Intercultural Development Inventory (IDI) (Hammer, 2003) and Cultural Intelligence (CQ) (Ang et al, 2007), to encourage library employees to intentionally think about culture in their workplace interactions and information literacy instructional practices. For several years we have been using the IDI as a tool for employees to evaluate and reflect on their own intercultural competence and we recently introduced CQ, a model that has been heavily used globally in the business community but is relatively new to libraries.



Through a pilot program, we recruited library employees to participate in a study where, over the duration of six months, they took pre-IDI and pre-CQ assessments, completed an online CQ learning module, debriefed with certified CQ and IDI facilitators, self-selected and participated in a series of intercultural learning activities, and completed post-IDI and post-CQ assessments. This session will introduce LILAC delegates to the IDI and CQ frameworks and share the pilot results from the 13 participants who completed our study. The presenters will highlight how other libraries and librarians may benefit from intentionally integrating IDI and CQ into their professional development practices. The 60-minute hands-on session will incorporate activities to engage attendees, including having the delegates take a brief portion of the intercultural competence assessments and activities that can be incorporated into the information literacy classroom.

References

Ang, S., Dyne, L. V., Koh, C., Ng, K. Y., Templer, K. J., Tay, C., & Chandrasekar, N. A. (2007). Cultural intelligence: Its measurement and effects on cultural judgment and decision making, cultural adaptation and task Performance. Management and Organization Review, 3(3), 335–371. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2007.00082.x


Bochenek, A., Howard, H., & Mayhook, Z. (2025). Integrating intercultural competencies in an introductory business information literacy course. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 25(1), 107–136. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2025.a950011



Hammer, M.R. (2003). Measuring intercultural sensitivity: The intercultural development inventory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27, 421-443. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-1767(03)00032-4


Hicks, A., & Lloyd, A. (2016). It takes a community to build a framework: Information literacy within intercultural settings. Journal of Information Science, 42(3), 334–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551516630219



Luo, J., & Chan, C. K. Y. (2022). Qualitative methods to assess intercultural competence in higher education research: A systematic review with practical implications. Educational Research Review, 37, 100476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100476



Morrison, R. (2009). Culturally-relevant Information Literacy: A case study [Ed.D., National Louis University]. https://digitalcommons.nl.edu/diss/20



Oxford University Press. (2010). New Oxford American Dictionary (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.



Zanescu, M. (2018). The University Library - an Intercultural and Multicultural Space. Revista Română De Biblioteconomie și Știința Informării = Romanian Journal of Library and Information Science, 14(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.26660/rrbsi.2018.14.1.1

Present @ LILAC

LILAC is great opportunity for our fellow professionals to present their ideas, share best practice and show case new thinking in our sector. If you have an idea then we'd love to hear about it. We have many options for the types of sessions you might run from a symposium to a workshop. Visit our Call for Presentations page to find out how to apply.

Book your place

Places at this year's conference are likely to be in demand more than ever before. Each year our conference grows increasingly popular and this year promises to be no different. Don't miss out and book your place now for this year's conference.
We look forward to seeing you there!

LILAC on Twitter

follow us @LILAC_conf

You can also find LILAC on

University of Sheffield, 30 March-1 April 2026

University of Sheffield, 30 March-1 April 2026